Connect with us

Reopen N.Y.C. Libraries on Sundays? Yes. Free 3-K for All? Not Quite.

Internashonal

Reopen N.Y.C. Libraries on Sundays? Yes. Free 3-K for All? Not Quite.


After months of tense and protracted negotiations, Mayor Eric Adams and City Council leaders announced on Friday that they had reached agreement on a $112.4 billion budget for New York City that restored many of the mayor’s proposed cuts, including to libraries and cultural institutions.

But other key programs were not made whole, including a popular and free preschool program for 3-year-olds.

This budget is particularly significant for Mr. Adams, a Democrat who is running for re-election in a competitive primary next June. Mr. Adams has insisted that major budget cuts were necessary to help offset the costs of the migrant crisis, new union contracts for city workers and the ending of federal pandemic aid.

The mayor and the City Council speaker, Adrienne Adams, adopted a celebratory tone at the announcement at City Hall, smiling and holding a model airplane to show that they had “landed the plane” as promised. Mr. Adams said they had found comity to fund important programs as the city faces major financial challenges.

“We are delivering a budget that invests in the future of our city and the working-class people who make New York City the greatest city in the world,” the mayor said.

For months, Council leaders and a wide range of advocates have argued that the mayor’s budget cuts would make life harder for New Yorkers at a moment when the city was increasingly unaffordable. Groups rallied on the steps of City Hall to call for more funding for libraries and preschools and enlisted celebrities such as Hillary Clinton and Rachel Griffin Accurso, a children’s entertainer known as Ms. Rachel.

Library leaders said on Friday that $58 million in restored funding would allow them to reopen branches on Sundays and to remain open on Saturdays. They added that Sunday reopenings would begin at some branches “in the coming weeks,” returning to the same hours of operation before cuts forced the closures in November.

The fight over the libraries was emblematic of the deep divide between the mayor and representatives of Ms. Adams. The two sides could not agree on basic revenue estimates and offered vastly different visions for the city. Neither got everything they wanted.

Ms. Adams hinted at their differences on Friday, arguing that the city should move “away from restoring and toward strengthening and building” during the budget process — a reference to the mayor’s budget cuts.

As the budget process progressed, updated revenue projections showed that many of the cuts weren’t needed. Both fiscally conservative and liberal good government groups and the Independent Budget Office said City Hall’s revenue projections were inaccurate. But the mayor ordered agencies to slash their budgets anyway.

Nathan Gusdorf, the director of the left-leaning Fiscal Policy Institute, said the mayor’s “unduly pessimistic revenue forecasts” were “fiscally irresponsible” and had resulted in hiring freezes and the elimination of jobs that helped the city run smoothly.

“As the cost of living rises and our city loses working and middle-class families,” Mr. Gusdorf said, “the mayor should prioritize deeper investments in child care and affordable housing to keep New Yorkers here rather than insisting on budget cuts that will only drive more families out.”

Justin Brannan, the chairman of the Council’s Finance Committee, said he and his colleagues never doubted that the city had enough revenue to restore most of the mayor’s cuts and to make investments in housing and mental health.

“If we want to make sure New York City remains the capital of the world,” Mr. Brannan said, “we’ve got to keep investing in it.”

The budget also includes $2 billion in capital funding for affordable housing and restores funding for arts programs, H.I.V. treatment programs, community composting, summer youth programs and half-price MetroCards for poor New Yorkers.

A package of roughly $100 million was included for early childhood education, including for young children with disabilities.

About $20 million will pay for additional preschool seats for 3-year-olds, which is known as 3-K. Other funding aims to fill vacant seats and clear wait lists for children who receive special education services, and a biweekly working group will focus on addressing the problems.

Some 3-K supporters were disappointed that the program did not receive enough funding to make it truly universal.

“Parents are grateful to the New York City Council for their herculean efforts in achieving a budget that rolls back some of the mayor’s cuts to 3-K,” said Rebecca Bailin, executive director of New Yorkers United for Child Care. “Despite these steps, families are still facing millions in unnecessary cuts to 3-K.”

Jennifer March, executive director of Citizens’ Committee for Children, a nonprofit, praised the planned operational changes to 3-K. If the city fills empty seats that are currently funded, “we’d make big leaps forward” toward universal 3-K, Ms. March said.

Other groups, including supporters of city parks, expressed more disappointment that the budget deal did not address their cuts, saying they were “left behind.”

“There is no doubt that every New Yorker will notice the effects of such a shortsighted and harmful parks budget,” said Adam Ganser, executive director of New Yorkers for Parks.

The city’s tax revenues were roughly $650 million higher than expected over two fiscal years, which helped fend off some of the deeper cuts. Still, a budget deficit of $5.5 billion is expected in 2026, and budget watchdogs have cautioned that the city is not prepared for an economic downturn and called for more money to be placed in reserve.

“The mayor has talked a lot about efficiency, but we have yet to see the rubber meet the road,” said Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission.

Some Democrats who are considering running against Mr. Adams next year have criticized him, arguing that his budget cuts have sowed confusion and hurt working-class New Yorkers. The mayor’s cuts to early-childhood education programs, for example, are expected to be a major issue in the upcoming primary.

“The mayor should be laser-focused on making our city more livable and more affordable,” said Zellnor Myrie, a state senator from Brooklyn who is exploring a mayoral run. “Instead, his mismanagement and budget cuts are making it harder for families in every way.”

Scott Stringer, the former city comptroller who is exploring a primary challenge against Mr. Adams, said the mayor’s questionable revenue projections made it feel like the city had regressed to the “bad old budget days of the 1970s when the city was on the edge of bankruptcy” and lamented that the budget had harmed families and children in particular.

Jessica Ramos, a state senator from Queens who is also considering running for mayor, called the budget “mediocre and uninspired” and said the budget process should “evolve past public gaslighting.”

Mr. Adams was seemingly unaffected by the criticism during the budget handshake ceremony. He praised his “fiscal responsibility” during the budget process, but also urged New Yorkers to celebrate what had been restored — even holding a campaign-style pep rally afterward.



Source link

More in Internashonal

A2Z ADMINISTRATION

AD

To Top