Connect with us

Jury list impounded following Karen Read mistrial

Internashonal

Jury list impounded following Karen Read mistrial


Within hours of Karen Read’s defense arguing that some charges should be dismissed following her high-profile mistrial, citing alleged information from members of the jury, the judge who oversaw the case ordered the impoundment of the jurors’ names, at least temporarily. Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial on July 1 after the jury of six women and six men informed her that they were hopelessly deadlocked in their deliberations. Prosecutors have said they are determined to retry the case.Read, 44, of Mansfield, is accused of hitting O’Keefe with her black SUV outside of a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton on Jan. 29, 2022, following a night of drinking. Her defense contends O’Keefe, a Boston police officer, was dragged outside after he was beaten up in the basement and bitten by a dog at fellow Boston officer Brian Albert’s home in Canton.Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley University, pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison, along with manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol and leaving a scene of personal injury and death. The manslaughter charge carries a penalty of five to 20 years in prison, and the other charge has a maximum penalty of 10 years.In a motion to dismiss and affidavits filed in the case on Monday, Read’s defense said they heard from one juror and two other informants who knew jurors that the panel agreed Read was not guilty of two of the three charges. The defense did not identify the sources of their alleged information about the jury. Defense attorney Alan Jackson claimed the juror came to him in order to dispute reports about the “split” among jurors. “Juror A was emphatic that Count 1 (second-degree murder) was ‘off the table’ and that all 12 of the jurors were in agreement that she was not guilty of such crime,” Jackson wrote.”Notice in this motion, there’s no affidavit from the juror. It’s all hearsay and more hearsay,” former Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said in an interview with NewsCenter 5.A few hours after the defense motions were filed, the docket shows Cannone issued the order to impound the list of jury names, citing concerns for their safety in the wake of the high-profile mistrial and ongoing arguments. The parties are due to return to court on July 22 for a status conference.Cannone’s order impounding the jury list is set to expire in ten days but can be extended.

Within hours of Karen Read’s defense arguing that some charges should be dismissed following her high-profile mistrial, citing alleged information from members of the jury, the judge who oversaw the case ordered the impoundment of the jurors’ names, at least temporarily.

Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial on July 1 after the jury of six women and six men informed her that they were hopelessly deadlocked in their deliberations. Prosecutors have said they are determined to retry the case.

Read, 44, of Mansfield, is accused of hitting O’Keefe with her black SUV outside of a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton on Jan. 29, 2022, following a night of drinking. Her defense contends O’Keefe, a Boston police officer, was dragged outside after he was beaten up in the basement and bitten by a dog at fellow Boston officer Brian Albert’s home in Canton.

Read, a former adjunct professor at Bentley University, pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison, along with manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol and leaving a scene of personal injury and death. The manslaughter charge carries a penalty of five to 20 years in prison, and the other charge has a maximum penalty of 10 years.

In a motion to dismiss and affidavits filed in the case on Monday, Read’s defense said they heard from one juror and two other informants who knew jurors that the panel agreed Read was not guilty of two of the three charges. The defense did not identify the sources of their alleged information about the jury.

Defense attorney Alan Jackson claimed the juror came to him in order to dispute reports about the “split” among jurors.

“Juror A was emphatic that Count 1 (second-degree murder) was ‘off the table’ and that all 12 of the jurors were in agreement that she was not guilty of such crime,” Jackson wrote.

“Notice in this motion, there’s no affidavit from the juror. It’s all hearsay and more hearsay,” former Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley said in an interview with NewsCenter 5.

A few hours after the defense motions were filed, the docket shows Cannone issued the order to impound the list of jury names, citing concerns for their safety in the wake of the high-profile mistrial and ongoing arguments.

The parties are due to return to court on July 22 for a status conference.

Cannone’s order impounding the jury list is set to expire in ten days but can be extended.



Source link

More in Internashonal

A2Z ADMINISTRATION

AD

To Top